Skip to main content
The blog

Cloud storage

Collaboration

Product & news

The best Nasuni alternative for cloud collaboration

February 2026

6 mins

An engineer on a laptop collaborating on an AEC project through LucidLink.

If you’ve spent any time with Nasuni, you probably know the pitch: cloud performance, without the cloud problems.

The reality can feel very different.

Caching appliances to deploy and maintain. Replication delays that turn “global collaboration” into a waiting game. VPNs that quietly creep back into workflows that were supposed to be modern and flexible.

Every middleman claims to make things faster — whether it’s filers, gateways or caches. In practice, they often just add cost, complexity and more points of failure.

That frustration is why so many AEC, media and enterprise IT teams start looking at Nasuni competitors and Nasuni alternatives in the first place.

LucidLink takes a fundamentally different approach: direct, secure file streaming from the cloud. No appliances, no sync layers and no staging files through an office before someone can work.

Just instant access to exactly what each team member needs, the moment they need it.

Where Nasuni works (and where it breaks)

Nasuni is a cloud-based file services platform designed to modernize traditional NAS environments for distributed teams.

At its core, Nasuni uses an edge filer architecture:

  • A central cloud backend stores authoritative data

  • Physical or virtual filer appliances sit in branch offices

  • Files are cached locally and synced between locations

For organizations with office-centric teams, predictable access patterns and a need to modernize legacy NAS without ripping everything out, edge filers solved real problems.

Where Nasuni holds up

Capabilities like global file locking, snapshots and centralized management remain table stakes for enterprise file systems. Nasuni delivers them reliably, along with rapid branch office deployment compared to traditional file servers.

For firms anchored to physical offices, with most work happening close to a filer, this architecture was a clear step forward. It brought cloud durability and centralized management to a world that still revolved around offices.

But work has changed.

Where the model breaks down

Nasuni’s benefits come directly from its architecture, but so do its limitations. As teams scale and work becomes more distributed, the edge filer model introduces friction.

4 cases in which Nasuni falls short - hardware overhead, maintenance burden, VPN dependence, and sync fragility across distributed teams.

Hardware and maintenance costs

Every office needs a filer node. That means procurement, refresh cycles, monitoring and troubleshooting. Cloud storage savings can quickly get eaten by appliance overhead.

VPN dependence

Remote users often need to connect back to a filer to get acceptable performance. VPNs reintroduce latency, security risk and IT support tickets — the very things cloud was meant to eliminate.

Sync fragility

Replication between filers isn’t instant. Conflicts happen. Sync jobs fail. Large file updates bottleneck collaboration when teams need to move fast.

Location-based performance

Performance depends on proximity to a filer. Move people out of offices or collaborate across regions and the experience becomes inconsistent.

The challenge comes down to architecture. Nasuni solves “fast cloud access” by inserting hardware in the middle. LucidLink solves it by removing the middleman entirely.

Why teams explore Nasuni competitors 

Modern teams working with large files don’t think in terms of filers or branch offices. They think in terms of work getting done.

3 reasons organizations look beyond Nasuni: scaling hardware with new offices, growing replication complexity across regions, and increased VPN reliance for remote teams.

AEC firms, studios and enterprise teams handling CAD, BIM, GIS, video and 3D data need:

  • Instant access without staging files through appliances

  • Real-time collaboration across cities and time zones

  • Predictable performance for remote and hybrid staff

Edge filer models start to strain under those demands.

Where edge filers stop scaling

  • Every new office means new hardware

  • Every new region adds replication complexity

  • VPNs quietly become “required” again

  • IT spends more time maintaining infrastructure than enabling work

That’s why searches for Nasuni competitors keep growing. Teams want to know if the model supports how they actually work.

What a true Nasuni alternative should do

The real question for teams evaluating Nasuni competitors is which solution removes the most friction.

6 characteristics to look for in a Nasuni alternative: no on-prem hardware, direct cloud streaming, smart local caching, real-time collaboration, infrastructure-free scaling, and enterprise-grade security.

A true Nasuni alternative should:

  • Remove the middleman: no on-prem hardware or filer nodes required

  • Stream files directly from the cloud: only the data blocks you touch, nothing staged or pre-synced

  • Use smart local caching: each user caches what they need automatically, not entire folders

  • Enable real-time collaboration: changes appear instantly, without conflicted copies

  • Scale without infrastructure sprawl: add users and locations without adding hardware

  • Meet enterprise security standards: zero-knowledge encryption, granular permissions and time-machine-style snapshots

This is where LucidLink diverges sharply from edge filer platforms.

How LucidLink solves the large file problem

LucidLink is cloud-native file storage built for performance, not retrofitted for it, which matters when an AEC team is working with large CAD, BIM and GIS files every day.

There are no appliances, no gateways and no sync jobs running in the background.

4 ways LucidLink resolves large file obstacles: cloud object storage, lightweight client access, on-demand block-level streaming, and smart local device caching.

How it works

  • Files live in object storage in the cloud

  • Users connect via lightweight client software

  • Data streams on demand, block by block

  • Each device caches only what’s needed

To the user, it feels like a local drive. To IT, it’s a fully managed, software-only platform.

What that changes in practice for AEC teams

No appliances, no gateways

Nothing to deploy in offices. Nothing to refresh every few years. That simplicity is especially valuable for firms supporting hybrid AEC workflows, where staff move between offices, home and job sites.

No VPNs

Users connect securely from anywhere with an internet connection. Remote access doesn’t depend on which office hosts the filer or whether a VPN is behaving that day.

One shared source of truth

Everyone works in the same file system, whether they’re in the office or remote. No copies. No delays. No guessing which version is current.

Predictable performance for large files

Open a massive CAD or BIM file without downloading the whole thing first.

For teams with heavier local demands, LucidLink also offers TeamCache — an optional shared cache node that boosts performance without reintroducing complex filer architectures.

For a deeper dive, read our breakdown of file streaming vs edge filers

Nasuni vs LucidLink

A table comparing the features of Nasuni/ edge filer and LucidLink.

Why AEC firms are switching to Nasuni competitors

For many AEC firms, Nasuni and Panzura were stepping stones away from legacy NAS. But as teams became more distributed, those platforms stopped keeping up.

How Widseth lowered costs after replacing Nasuni

Challenge: large CAD and Revit files, multiple offices and rising infrastructure costs.

After moving to LucidLink, Widseth saw:

  • 25% lower total cost compared to Nasuni

  • More usable storage without filer appliances

  • Reduced IT time spent managing edge infrastructure

Read the full story here.

Why Torti Gallas + Partners didn’t pick Nasuni or Panzura

Challenge: distributed CAD and BIM teams, VPN bottlenecks, work-from-anywhere mandate.

With Panzura and Nasuni we would still have had to VPN into the office which is sort of pointless. It didn't solve our work-from-anywhere initiative.” Omer Mushahwar, CTO

Read the full story here.

How BGE replaced VDI-level complexity

Challenge: high-performance access with VDI cost and overhead.

“LucidLink gives us VDI-level speed without VDI.” Jeremy Gaskins, Director of Technology Solutions

Read the full story here.

Stop adding middlemen and start streaming

Avoid the middleman and get direct access through LucidLink.

Nasuni and other edge filer platforms solved a real problem for their time.

But adding appliances, caches and sync layers to “fix” the cloud creates new bottlenecks — more hardware to manage, more points of failure and more friction for teams that need to work from anywhere.

LucidLink takes a different approach.

No filers, no VPNs and no sync delays. Just direct, secure access to your files in the cloud, streaming exactly what each person needs, when they need it.

For teams working with massive CAD, BIM, video, 3D or research files, cutting out the middleman makes the difference between stalled workflows and real progress.

If you’re exploring Nasuni competitors, see how LucidLink gives teams direct, secure cloud access to large files — try it free for 30 days.

FAQs

Teams search for Nasuni competitors when edge filer models start slowing them down. Large CAD, BIM, GIS or video files can bottleneck replication, VPNs add latency and scaling means more hardware. A true alternative streamlines access and supports real-time collaboration.

The best Nasuni competitors remove appliances, VPNs and sync layers, streaming large files directly from the cloud. LucidLink, for example, gives distributed teams a single source of truth, real-time access and enterprise-grade security. This allows AEC, media and IT teams to collaborate seamlessly from anywhere.

Unlike Nasuni’s edge filer approach, LucidLink streams files directly from the cloud, block by block. There’s no appliance to manage, no sync delays and remote staff get predictable performance — ideal for hybrid AEC workflows.

Yes. The best Nasuni alternatives, including LucidLink, are built for large files. Teams can open massive CAD, BIM or GIS files without waiting for full downloads, making distributed collaboration faster and simpler.

If replication delays, VPN dependence or hardware costs are slowing your teams, it’s time to explore alternatives. Teams handling large files or supporting hybrid workflows benefit most from solutions that remove filer appliances and deliver direct cloud access.

Hybrid AEC workflows rely on team members working from offices, job sites or home. A good Nasuni alternative like LucidLink provides a single source of truth, real-time access to large files without VPNs and consistent performance. Features like cloud streaming, smart caching and enterprise-grade security let distributed teams collaborate efficiently and scale without adding infrastructure.

Join our newsletter

Get all our latest news and creative tips

Want the details? Read our Privacy Policy. Not loving our emails?
Unsubscribe anytime or drop us a note at support@lucidlink.com.